Meng, Q; Zhu, J; Li, Z and Chong, H Y (2024) Clarifying unsafe behaviors of construction workers through a complex network of unsafe behavior chains. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(11): 04024164, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Numerous studies indicate that unsafe behaviors of construction workers (UBCW) are the direct causes of most construction safety incidents. To unveil the interconnections among unsafe behaviors and the underlying mechanisms of different accident types, this study extracts the unsafe behavior chains from accidents. Based on the theory of complex networks, we constructs both the whole network of UBCW and four subnetworks corresponding to different accident types by using unsafe behavior chains. The findings reveal that the degree distributions of all networks conform to truncated power-law distributions, highlighting the critical role of hub nodes in accident occurrences. Moreover, the whole network exhibits small-world characteristics, underscoring the need to address the propagation and clustering effects of unsafe behaviors, reassess risk management approaches, and devise targeted control strategies and measures. By analyzing the topological structures of the networks, this paper ranks the importance of different behaviors across various metrics and proposes tailored accident prevention recommendations through comparative analysis of different accident types. This research holds significant theoretical and practical implications for refining accident causality models and enhancing safety management practices at construction sites. However, the study has limitations, notably future studies should focus on the absence of specific construction accident databases and the unaddressed link between accident severity and unsafe behaviors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accidents; complex network theory; construction workers; unsafe behavior chains |
| Index terms: | construction accident, construction safety, safety management, unsafe behaviour, accident prevention, comparative analysis, construction site, strategy, risk management, propagation, future study, clustering, construction worker, database |
| Subjects: | work location, data analysis and analytics, data science, risk assessment, engineering process, research design and methodology, occupational health and safety management, data management, environmental health, management, practitioner, financial risk |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Site Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here