A tripartite governance strategy for infrastructure reits considering tax incentives and antiavoidance regulations

Wang, Y; Zhuang, J; Lai, R and Chen, L (2024) A tripartite governance strategy for infrastructure reits considering tax incentives and antiavoidance regulations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(11): 04024162, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Tax incentives are a powerful driver for the development of infrastructure real estate investment trusts (REITs). Complementary antiavoidance regulations are essential to ensure the sustainable and healthy development of the REIT market. This paper breaks through the traditional policy approach that emphasizes incentives but neglects supervision. Based on factors such as information asymmetry and regulatory capture, a tripartite game model of REIT tax incentives and antiavoidance regulation is established. Utilizing global REIT policy and market data, the paper sets parameter values and conducts numerical simulations to explore the dynamic strategic interaction mechanisms among the government, REIT stakeholders, and financial regulators. The study finds that (1) government's tax incentive policies and regulatory strategies show a phase transition characteristic with the changes of REIT market returns; and (2) based on the project's profit status, financial regulators and investors are prone to develop a collusive avoidance evolutionary strategy. Therefore, antiavoidance regulations and mechanisms to prevent regulatory capture should be implemented in tandem to ensure the efficiency of tax incentives. The conclusion of the study provides a theoretical basis for the formulation of REIT tax incentive policy and the promotion of the sustainable development of the REIT market.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: antiavoidance; real estate investment trusts; tax incentives; tripartite evolutionary game
Index terms: sustainable development, profit, investor, real estate investment, regulation, supervision, information asymmetry, governance, efficiency, regulator, promotion, interaction, evolutionary game, numerical simulation, strategy
Subjects: economic analysis, political science, economic theory, health safety and environment, transaction economics, control systems, business, behavioral psychology, modelling and simulation, performance management, sociology, management
Topics: Project Management, Health and Safety, Governance, Quality Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here