Wijayarathne, N; Gunawan, I and Schultmann, F (2024) Dynamic capabilities in digital transformation: A systematic review of their role in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(11): 03124008, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The relationship between digital transformation (DT) and dynamic capabilities (DC) has been extensively studied in various industries; however, their implications in the construction sector are lagging. The study uses the PRISMA framework and NVivo to systematically review 63 peer-reviewed journal articles, examining how DT and related technologies like BIM, AI, and the IoT are integrated into the global construction industry. Findings reveal that while these technologies enhance operational efficiency and innovation, they face barriers such as cultural resistance, high costs, and skill shortages. The analysis highlights the essential role of DC in understanding and facilitating the effective integration of DT into construction. The paper indicates the need for future studies to develop strategic frameworks and regulatory guidelines for successful DT implementation. Further, it identifies the long-Term environmental and sustainability impacts of DT as crucial areas for future research, emphasizing the importance of addressing both technological and socio-economic aspects. Additionally, it encourages stakeholders involved in the DT process to acquire the necessary skills required for technology implementation and DT.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | efficiency, construction sector, integration, global construction, implementation, transformation, dynamic capability, skill shortage, construction industry, future study, systematic literature review, journal, face |
| Subjects: | management, research dissemination and communication, research evaluation and metrics, performance management, strategic management, industry analysis, psychology, organizational analysis, business, research design and methodology, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Procurement, International Construction, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Quality Management, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here