Exploring the internal influence mechanism of group safety behavior of construction workers: Qualitative method approach

Yue, H; Ye, G; Cao, H; Liu, Q; Xiang, Q and Luo, Y (2024) Exploring the internal influence mechanism of group safety behavior of construction workers: Qualitative method approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(11): 04024163, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The group safety behavior of construction workers has become a topic of global concern calling for effective organizational management measures. However, existing research predominantly relies on empirical case studies, which solely focus on factors without delving into the underlying theoretical mechanisms that drive group safety behaviors. This limitation hinders a comprehensive understanding of how organizational management measures systematically influence safety behaviors. Against this background, this paper reviews and emphasizes how organizational management measures mitigate the interference of environmental factors, subsequently influencing group internal factors and group safety behavior. The qualitative simulation (QSIM) method was used to investigate the variations and distribution patterns of group safety behavior and group internal factors in 10 different simulation schemes with varying intensities and strategies. The findings reveal that: (1) organizational management measures must outweigh the disruptive effects of environmental factors for positive developments in internal group factors and subsequent improvements in group safety behavior; (2) organizational management measures influence group safety behavior through two pathways. First, they directly impact group safety behavior, resulting in significant improvements but failing to enhance group internal factors. Second, they initially affect internal group factors, which subsequently influence group safety behavior; and (3) in resource-abundant scenarios, safety utility is maximized when multiple organizational management measures are employed, whereas in resource-constrained situations, prioritizing a single measure yields the greatest increase in safety utility. The study links organizational management measures, group internal factors, and environmental factors together, filling the gap in the model of construction workers' group safety behavior and expanding the application of group theory in the construction industry. Project managers can adopt targeted control measures tailored to the specific environmental and internal group factors to reduce safety behavior risks among construction worker groups.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction workers; group internal factors; group safety behaviors; organizational management measures; qualitative simulation (qsim) approach
Index terms: prioritizing, project manager, case study, safety behaviour, construction industry, construction worker, qualitative method, organizational management, strategy, variation, positive development, environmental factor
Subjects: profession, data collection methods, research design and methodology, business, industry analysis, occupational health and safety management, decision analysis, contractual condition, management, environmental science, practitioner, urban design
Topics: Health and Safety, Risk Management, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here