Chammout, B; Ahmed, M O and El-Adaway, I (2024) Assessing the critical factors influencing worker safety in roadway work zones. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(12): 04024180, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Ongoing roadway construction and maintenance activities are essential for sustaining and improving infrastructure. Nonetheless, work zones in the United States continue to experience concerning frequencies of occupational and traffic accidents. Previous research highlighted multiple factors influencing work zone safety, yet their relative impact and importance remain unclear. This study addresses this gap following a multistep methodology. First, 32 safety factors were identified through an extensive literature review in a previous study. Second, a survey was administered among 298 professionals from diverse backgrounds, with an average of 17.75 years of construction experience and 13.78 years of work zone experience, to assess the importance of identified factors on worker safety. Third, data reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and survey responses were evaluated to uncover experts' perceptions regarding the criticality of factors affecting worker safety. Lastly, clustering analysis was utilized to group the recorded levels of work zone safety factor criticality. Survey results indicate that driver-related factors, such as drivers' level of attention and unsafe driving, are perceived as most critical to worker safety in work zones. Conversely, factors associated with motor vehicles, conditions of construction equipment, and technological sophistication are perceived as the least critical. Findings from the clustering analysis revealed three groups of factors with varying levels of criticality, where the most critical group comprised driver, work, and design-related factors. The findings of this study contribute to guiding state DOTs and safety practitioners in enhancing their safety practices and culture with a focus on worker-centered perceptions. Additionally, this analysis identifies key areas for future research that are vital for improving worker safety in work zones. These include exploring underexplored factors, such as driver impairment, level of attention, and clarity of signage and markings, among others.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | clustering, construction equipment, critical factor, impairment, methodology, safety factor, practitioner, United States, literature review, survey |
| Subjects: | data science, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, risk assessment, health conditions and diseases, construction equipment, practitioner, research methods, Geography, financial risk |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Plant and Equipment, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here