Nguyen, T; Do, Q; Le, T and Le, C (2024) Discovering workers' actions leading to severe construction accidents using accident report data and sequence mining techniques. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(12): 04024172, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Historical construction accident reports have been widely used to gain insights into the primary causes of past incidents in construction. Previous studies have successfully identified accident causes and affected body parts. However, there remains a gap in understanding the high-risk actions of workers. This study aims to fill this gap by conducting a novel investigation into the most prevalent sequential patterns between workers' actions prior to severe accidents. The study extracted sequential accident patterns by applying the PrefixSpan sequential pattern mining algorithm on a large database of action-accident-consequences manually built from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's construction accident reports. Social Network Analysis was then performed to determine high-risk workers' actions leading to severe accidents. Additionally, statistical tests were employed to explore the sectoral differences in the rank of high-risk actions. The study revealed the priority for 24 high-risk actions leading to severe accidents in construction. The ranking of these actions was found statistically different between construction sectors. Organizations can utilize the findings to develop targeted safety programs and interventions to mitigate future incidents in the construction industry. This study, however, was limited by the size of the sequential database, resulting from the manual data annotation process. This issue could be mitigated in future research by exploring semiautomated annotation approaches.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accident report; construction accident; occupational safety and health administration; sequential pattern mining; social network analysis; workers' actions |
| Index terms: | social network analysis, statistical test, safety programs, construction sector, construction accident, database, construction industry, investigation, occupational safety and health, mining |
| Subjects: | research methods, data collection methods, statistical analysis, industry analysis, geotechnical engineering, occupational health and safety management, data management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Digital Applications, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here