Panquet, Q; Bourgault, M; Pellerin, R; Danjou, C and Perrier, N (2024) A process-improvement method for implementing earned value-based project management in organizations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(12): 04024170, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Project monitoring has become crucial to the success of organizations in an increasingly competitive industrial environment. As such, earned value management (EVM) is an essential part of project cost control. Over the years, the scientific literature has mainly focused on developing mathematical models to improve EVM, whereas very few researchers have examined the implementation of EVM in organizations. Although some standards provide general guidelines for implementing the methodology, they rarely consider the maturity of the organization or the strategy required to implement it. This paper aims to develop an EVM implementation plan method for organizations. The method identifies the activities to be carried out, their sequencing, and the corresponding roles, techniques, and deliverables associated with each activity. The analysis of this phase of the existing situation allows for a consideration of the organization's maturity level based on a process mapping analysis and its audit of the organization. Relevant recommendations are then identified before defining EVM implementation strategies according to the organization's needs, constraints, and resources. Interviews with professionals allowed for the verification of the relevance of the recommendations before assigning them to the defined implementation strategies at every stage of implementation. The impact of each strategy on the organization's processes is mapped and analyzed to determine the expected costs and benefits. The implementation method was tested successfully within a firm.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design research methodology; earned value management; project management |
| Index terms: | interview, mathematical model, strategy, earned value management, project cost, methodology, mapping, project monitoring, maturity level, audit, research methodology, implementation, project management |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, research design and methodology, mathematical modelling, control systems, performance measurement, management, economics, project management theory and practice, contractual arrangements, research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, evaluation |
| Topics: | Project Management, Procurement, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here