LSTM-CNN architecture for construction activity recognition using optimal positioning of wearables

Rajak, S and Vimal, V (2024) LSTM-CNN architecture for construction activity recognition using optimal positioning of wearables. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(12): 04024179, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Enhancing construction worker performance, safety, and project management through automated activity classification is a promising endeavor. By extracting activity-level information, this technology provides valuable insights for informed decision-making, facilitating project schedule adjustments, efficient resource management, and improved construction site control. Previous studies in this domain focused on basic activities, neglecting optimal sensor placement and no regard for worker comfort. This paper extends beyond existing research, encompassing a broader range of complex construction activities and surpassing current methods. Utilizing unobtrusive wearables like a smartwatch and smartphone, the study determines optimal sensor positions (dominant/nondominant wrist, dominant/nondominant leg pocket). Notably, it introduces a novel deep neural network structure, merging long short-term memory (LSTM) and convolutional layers, offering an innovative solution for automated activity classification tasks in the construction industry. This model extracts activity features automatically reducing the need for manual feature engineering and performs classification with few model parameters indicating efficiency in terms of computational resources and memory requirements making the model more suitable for real-time applications and deployment on resource-constrained devices. By leveraging the strengths of both convolutional layers and LSTM, this approach offers a powerful and efficient solution for activity classification tasks. An experimental study was carried out to recognize four different activities: manual excavation, rebar stirrups, cement plastering, and bar binding. These were performed by four subjects (three males and one female) for 30 s each with different positions of smartwatch and smartphone producing 24,080 data points. Results indicate the optimal positioning of wearables to be smartwatch on dominant hand and smartphone on opposite leg pocket because of a balanced and effective coverage of the relevant movements and contextual information yielding 98.18% accuracy, 98.20% precision, 98.17% recall, and F1 score of 98.17%.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: activity classification; construction projects; convolutional neural networks; merging long short-term memory; wearables
Index terms: stirrup, efficiency, construction activity, rebar, comfort, resource management, project management, construction industry, construction worker, movement, placement, accuracy, experiment, construction site, neural network, excavation, decision-making, construction project
Subjects: artificial intelligence, building materials, work location, control systems, data collection methods, industry analysis, decision analysis, occupational health and safety management, professional development, project management theory and practice, performance management, management, construction operations, practitioner, health behaviours and lifestyles, production management, structural engineering
Topics: Health and Safety, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Quality Management, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here