Lee, J S and Ham, Y (2025) Paradox of time pressure: Cognitive and task performance during time-sensitive and challenging teleoperation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(1): 04024186, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
A heavy machinery operators' ability to adhere to schedules is crucial for the success of construction projects. However, unforeseen delays often occur during projects, forcing operators to expedite their work. This pressure often presents challenges for teleoperators. Completing tasks remotely typically takes longer than performing the same tasks on-site due to reduced situational awareness and reliance on technology for perception and understanding in remote workplaces. These inherent aspects of teleoperation add complexity to tasks, especially under time-constrained conditions. This study explores operators' cognitive and task performance during teleoperation of challenging tasks under various time pressures. Thirty-one participants operated a virtual excavator under four different levels of time pressure during the experiments. Results show that appropriate time pressure enhances task performance in aspects of safety, productivity, and quality, whereas excessive pressure results in cognitive overload, disengagement, impaired situational awareness, increased errors, and reduced productivity. This research contributes to enhancing the understanding of teleoperation from the operator's perspective, addressing cognitive challenges to improve safety and efficiency during the remote operation of heavy machinery in construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | excavator; human factors; situational awareness; teleoperation; time pressure |
| Index terms: | experiment, construction project, complexity, paradox, human factor, efficiency, productivity |
| Subjects: | social theory and frameworks, data collection methods, occupational health and safety management, systems engineering, management, performance management, production management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here