Low-carbon multiobjective optimization for repetitive projects based on crew-based scheduling strategy

Yao, Z; Zhang, L; Hua, Z and Luo, C (2025) Low-carbon multiobjective optimization for repetitive projects based on crew-based scheduling strategy. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(1): 04024183, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Repetitive projects represent a significant proportion of the construction industry. Effectively reducing carbon emissions from such projects plays an important role in mitigating climate change. This study employs the Line-of-Balance (LOB) method as a scheduling tool to explore the trade-offs among carbon emissions, duration, and costs in repetitive projects. Initially, this study addresses the limitations of traditional LOB scheduling strategies and proposes a new scheduling strategy from the perspective of crews. Moreover, the "controlled acceleration"routine is extended within the LOB framework. Subsequently, this study elucidates a calculation method for total carbon emissions during the construction phase of repetitive projects and establishes a trade-off model among carbon emissions, duration, and costs based on the proposed strategy. The NSGA-II algorithm was then devised to solve the Pareto set. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed strategy was validated through a highway project. The research findings demonstrate that adopting the Crew-based Scheduling Strategy significantly reduces project carbon emissions and costs while shortening the duration when compared with traditional strategies. Furthermore, the controlled acceleration routine enhances resource utilization and achieves superior project performance. This study provides robust support for advancing the construction industry toward low-carbon and sustainable development.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: carbon emissions; line-of-balance; NSGA-II algorithm; repetitive projects
Index terms: routine, scheduling, strategy, sustainable development, climate change, repetitive project, resource utilization, carbon emission, highway construction, project performance, effectiveness, construction phase, duration, construction industry, acceleration
Subjects: health safety and environment, production management, climate science, site logistics, operations research, project management theory and practice, civil engineering, performance management, management, industry analysis, sociology, project controls, project delivery
Topics: Time Control, Site Management, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here