Jelodar, M B; Yiu, T W and Wilkinson, S (2015) Systematic representation of relationship quality in conflict and dispute: For construction projects. Construction Economics and Building, 15(1), pp. 89-103. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
The construction industry needs to move towards more relational procurement procedures to reduce extensive losses of value and avoid conflicts and disputes. Despite this, the actual conceptualization and assessment of relationships during conflict and dispute incidents seem to be neglected. Via a review of literature, relationship quality is suggested as a systematic framework for construction projects. General system theory is applied and a framework consistent of four layers respectively labelled as triggering, antecedent, moderation and outcome is suggested. Two different case studies are undertaken to represent the systematic framework; which verifies that changes in contracting circumstances and built environment culture can affect the identified layers.Through system reliability theories a fault tree is derived to represent a systematic framework of relationship quality. The combinations of components, causes, and events for two case studies are mapped out through fault tree. By analysing the fault tree the combination of events that lead to relationship deterioration may be identified. Consequently the progression of simple events into failure is formulized and probabilities allocated. Accordingly the importance and the contribution of these events to failure become accessible. The ability to have such indications about relationship quality may help increase performance as well as sustainable procurement. Paper Type: Research article
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | relationship quality; conflict; dispute; fault tree analysis; general system theories. |
| Index terms: | case study, built environment, fault-tree analysis, construction project, deterioration, dispute, construction industry |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, risk management, production management, data collection methods, material degradation and durability, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here