Zhang, K; Cui, Q and DeCorla-Souza, P (2025) Performance and efficiency diffusion of us surface transportation public-private partnerships. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(1): 04024192, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
With successes and attritions, the US transportation industry has implemented public-private partnership (P3) projects for over 3 decades. However, performance inquiries of P3 have not kept up with its development, showing mixed results. The predominantly cross-sectional approach may mask a certain within-project effect on cost and time certainty. Using 133 major transportation projects from the Information Source for Major Projects database, the authors performed piecewise linear growth curve modeling to parse out variation attributable to delivery method and variation attributable to that within-project effect, conveniently termed efficiency diffusion. The results revealed that P3 is on par with design-bid-build (DBB) in terms of cost certainty, but performs better in terms of time certainty. In contrast, efficiency diffusion from P3 is evident in cost but not in time. In other words, P3 creates a spillover and internalization of technical and managerial innovations, inducing cost savings. This is the first longitudinal study to reconcile previous cross-sectional efforts, and showed P3's better time certainty compared with DBB using project-level data in the US while confirming the delivery method's cost-saving spillover effect, effectively raising the bar.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost performance; efficiency diffusion; growth curve; longitudinal analysis; public-private partnership; time performance |
| Index terms: | cost performance, variation, time performance, transportation project, longitudinal analysis, cost saving, modelling, design-bid-build, database, major project, delivery method, partnership, efficiency |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, delivery method, project controls, data management, partnership management, infrastructure and transport systems, economics, performance management, contractual condition, analytical methods, strategic project management, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Quality Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here