Lidar-rgb data fusion for four-dimensional uav-based monitoring of reinforced concrete bridge construction: Case study of the fern hollow bridge reconstruction

Zhu, Y; Brigham, J C and Fascetti, A (2025) Lidar-rgb data fusion for four-dimensional uav-based monitoring of reinforced concrete bridge construction: Case study of the fern hollow bridge reconstruction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(1): 05024016, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The complexity of large-scale bridge construction necessitates continuous monitoring to perform quality assurance and control, both of which have a great influence on structural performance and durability. Conventional approaches to monitoring bridge construction heavily rely on human inspection and expert judgment performed on-site by trained technicians. However, these often lack the required spatial and/or temporal resolution in the obtainable data, and are inefficient and potentially dangerous for the operators. In this context, the development of automated systems and advanced sensing solutions brings the opportunity to enhance accuracy and efficiency, minimize human error, and mitigate safety risks. Laser scanning technology, known for its precision in target representations, combined with uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) serving as multifunctional sensor platforms, are a promising means for safe and efficient monitoring of bridge construction. This manuscript presents an experimental case study focused on the application of UAV-based LiDAR-RGB data fusion for bridge reconstructions, to assess their effectiveness in monitoring bridge construction. Four-dimensional models of the bridge were constructed based on data collected via LiDAR and photogrammetry. The models generated with the two approaches then were compared formally with the target design values to ascertain their accuracy. The results demonstrate that construction monitoring strategies that only rely on photogrammetric information can provide results with insufficient accuracy, particularly in terms of the integrity of the three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions and the accuracy of the geometry and slope of the bridge superstructure. In contrast, LiDAR-RGB data fusion can provide precise and comprehensive spatial information on bridge construction, such as global and local geometry of the bridge and information on the positioning of different structural elements in the deck, which can significantly benefit construction management and construction quality assessment and control.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bridge construction; lidar; photogrammetry; uncrewed aerial vehicles
Index terms: resolution, effectiveness, monitoring, data fusion, inspection, durability, integrity, case study, judgment, platform, geometry, reconstruction, efficiency, complexity, construction quality, bridge construction, laser scanning, reinforced concrete, quality assurance, accuracy, slope, strategy
Subjects: professional development, performance management, management, systems engineering, geotechnical engineering, conflict resolution, dispute resolution, control systems, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, material degradation and durability, data science, building materials, infrastructure engineering, digital design, health safety and environment, quality assurance, building construction, analytical methods
Topics: Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Construction Materials, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here