Bettemir, O H (2025) Analysis of existing resource distribution metrics and suggestion of new metrics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(2): 04024195, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Resource leveling aims to reduce peak resource demand and fluctuations in resource usage histograms throughout a construction period. The objective function optimum can be obtained in the digitalized construction management era. However, the correct quantification of uneven resource distribution is also essential because an improper resource distribution metric may even worsen the resource distribution. The behaviors of existing resource distribution metrics were not examined thoroughly in the literature. This study aims to improve existing resource distribution metrics and analyze the objective functions to identify their positive and negative aspects. Eight existing resource leveling metrics were analyzed by considering their responses to the peak resource demand and fluctuations in daily resource demand. The analysis uncovered that the existing metrics were insensitive to either resource fluctuations or peak resource demand. The time insensitiveness of the minimum moment metric was eliminated by merging it with the sum of the square metric. In addition, a fractional order resource distribution metric was proposed to dissuasively penalize peak resource demand. A comparison of resource distribution metrics for two case study problems revealed that the proposed three resource distribution metrics presented better resource distribution histograms with less fluctuations and peak resource demand. This study revealed the behavior and disadvantages of existing resource distribution metrics such that the schedulers can foresee the probable output of the metrics, which may assist them in implementing a proper metric. Moreover, the metrics developed in this study provided better resource histograms, which was the theoretical contribution of this study.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | fractional order; optimization; resource distribution metrics; resource leveling problem |
| Index terms: | case study, quantification, scheduler, resource levelling |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, measurement and scaling, resource management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here