Myrvang, R and Liu, C Y A (2025) Beyond traditional methods: Enhancing cost escalation forecasting in commercial construction amid economic turbulence. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(2): 04024201, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The application of cost escalation rates to commercial construction projects has historically been a straightforward task for estimators. However, the onset of the post-COVID-19 recovery period has introduced unprecedented challenges. The surge in inflation, followed by sharp disinflation triggered by one of the most aggressive interest rate hike cycles in Federal Reserve history, has created significant obstacles in forecasting future costs, a situation unfamiliar to many contemporary construction cost estimators. Unlike previous research that predominantly focused on cost indices tracking labor rates and building materials, our study integrates the Turner Building Cost Index, which also accounts for the competitive condition of the marketplace. Although traditional academic forecasting tools may perform well during periods of gradual economic expansion, they often falter amidst recessions or sudden economic shocks. Recognizing the crucial role of the overall economy in future cost projections, our paper rigorously examines current economic conditions and emphasizes concerns stemming from recent monetary policy actions by the Federal Reserve. We introduce an integrated forecasting approach, combing quantitative analysis with qualitative insights from industry experts-a process referred to as decision science analysis. This method allows estimators to incorporate a comprehensive view of the current economic landscape, transcending conventional academic models. Our methodology projects costs across three scenarios: best-case, average, and worst-case. In the best-case scenario, assuming the US economy avoids a recession or sudden economic shock, the annual escalation rate is forecasted at 2.8% over the next 7 years. In contrast, a worst-case scenario characterized by a severe recession could cause a decrease in cost by 13% within 2 years of the index peak. This study underscores the importance of considering macroeconomic conditions during periods of heightened economic uncertainty. Furthermore, it showcases how effective collaboration between industry and academia can yield a robust and comprehensive forecasting approach, adaptable to any economic climate.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | commercial construction; cost escalation; macroeconomic; time-series forecasting; turner building cost index |
| Index terms: | decision science, commercial construction, construction cost, cost index, recovery, recession, economic condition, forecasting, academia, building material, COVID-19, cost escalation, quantitative analysis, history, inflation, methodology, interest rate, turbulence, collaboration, estimator |
| Subjects: | decision-making and optimization, research methods, operations management, economic analysis, construction type, educational institutions, economics, health risk and incident analysis, management, building materials, prediction and forecasting, fluid mechanics, architectural and construction history, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics, profession |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Education, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here