Sharma, N and Laishram, B (2025) Unveiling the path to the cost of quality implementation in the construction industry: Multivariate analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(2): 04024202, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The construction industry faces a significant challenge due to the absence of a well-established financial classification system for quality, leading to quality issues. Among the various quality management (QM) techniques available, the cost of quality (COQ) method is utilized to address these concerns. However, traditional COQ assumptions are static and do not reflect the adaptability required in modern QM for the construction industry, particularly due to hidden factors (HFs). These HFs play diverse roles in shaping the COQ system. The lack of a quantifiable COQ for monitoring quality costs impedes the adoption of the COQ framework within the construction industry. This study addresses these gaps by refining the traditional COQ categories and predicting the relationship between visible factors (VFs) and HFs through the lens of complexity theory. To fill this gap, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 142 experts specializing in QM within the Indian construction industry. Using SmartPLS 4.0, a hypothetical model was constructed to uncover the relationship between COQ categories. The results underscore the significant influence of profession on COQ, the influence of VFs and HFs on COQ, and the influence of COQ categories on achieving optimal quality. This study makes a substantial contribution to existing knowledge by forecasting COQ behavior and proposing future research directions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; cost of quality; hidden factors; implementation; quality management; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | multivariate analysis, face, survey, adaptability, questionnaire, complexity, forecasting, profession, monitoring, quality issue, implementation, construction industry, quality management |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, statistical analysis, industry analysis, data collection methods, control systems, prediction and forecasting, quality assurance, user focus, institututions, psychology, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Organizational Design, Site Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here