Wang, J; Huang, W and Chen, Y (2025) Solving stochastic time-cost trade-off problems via modified double-loop procedure with adaptive domain decomposition method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(2): 04024199, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Stochastic time-cost trade-off (TCT) problems are of significant concern to project managers because various uncertain factors have to be considered when making appropriate balance between project completion time and cost. In the paper we consider the stochastic TCT problem, where the project completion time (PCT) unreliability is involved and constrained to be less than a prescribed threshold. To tackle the concerned problem, previous studies have implemented the double loop procedure, where a genetic algorithm (GA) is used in the outer loop for optimization, and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) is used in the inner loop for examining the unreliability constraint. The original double loop procedure is computationally inefficient, taking hours or days even for a small to medium project. The present study proposes an efficient simulation method, referred to as adaptive domain decomposition method (DDM), to replace MCS for credibly examining the unreliability constraint. By modifying the double loop procedure with adaptive DDM, the computational resources can be effectively allocated, and the computational efficiency can be greatly improved. As shown in the illustrative example, the modified procedure significantly outperforms the original procedure, and it is hundreds of times faster to obtain similar optimization results. With the great efficiency improvement, this study contributes to the widespread acceptance of stochastic TCT analysis in practical applications.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | domain decomposition method; genetic algorithm; optimization; time-cost tradeoff; uncertainties |
| Index terms: | time-cost trade-off, efficiency, project manager, Monte Carlo simulation, completion time, genetic algorithm, tradeoff |
| Subjects: | algorithms, modelling and simulation, profession, project controls, decision analysis, quantity surveying, performance management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Time Control, Risk Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here