State awareness and collision risk assessment algorithm for tower crane based on bidirectional inverse perspective mapping and skeleton key points

Zhang, F; Liu, H; Wang, L; Chen, Z; Zhang, Q and Guo, L (2025) State awareness and collision risk assessment algorithm for tower crane based on bidirectional inverse perspective mapping and skeleton key points. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(2): 04024205, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

To address the current issues of frequent tower crane accidents, imperfect supervision systems and the low adaptability of existing algorithms, a novel collision risk warning model for tower cranes is proposed. The model comprises a state-awareness module and a collision risk assessment module. The skeleton key points of the tower crane are proposed and constructed in the state-awareness module. On this basis, the You Only Look Once (YOLO) v8 algorithm detects the tower crane and its skeleton key points. The ByteTrack algorithm is used to track skeleton key points in real time. In the collision risk assessment module, the speed analysis method for the skeleton key points of the tower crane and the minimum safety distance assessment method between different tower cranes are proposed and compiled. Finally, the effectiveness and robustness of this collision risk warning model are verified by taking three practical projects as examples. The research results demonstrate that the precision of the box, the precision of key points, the [email protected] of the box, and the [email protected] of key points are 96.18%, 96.10%, 92.85%, and 92.53%, respectively. This paper's method implements an intelligent assessment of tower crane collision risk. The model exhibits accurate visualization information in practical engineering applications and has broad application prospects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bidirectional inverse perspective mapping; bytetrack; distance assessment; skeleton key point; speed detection; tower crane; you only look once (yolo) v8
Index terms: effectiveness, adaptability, mapping, supervision, tower crane, visualization, risk assessment, real time, module
Subjects: design practice, maintenance engineering, spatial and geospatial analysis, financial risk, performance management, project controls, user focus, architectural elements, control systems
Topics: Project Management, Quality Management, Cost Management, Design Practice, Business Strategy, Time Control, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here