Harnessing project identity and safety norms to promote construction workers' safety behavior: Field intervention study

Bae, J; Choi, B; Krupka, E and Lee, S (2025) Harnessing project identity and safety norms to promote construction workers' safety behavior: Field intervention study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(3): 04024208, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The importance of workers' social identity in shaping their safety behaviors has become increasingly acknowledged. Among various social identities (e.g., workgroup, trade, etc.), improving project identity stands out as particularly impactful; it not only promotes safer behaviors among workers but also establishes a shared identity that unites all project members, thereby enhancing their sense of belonging. However, existing management strategies, primarily designed for traditional, long-term organizations, often require substantial managerial efforts to build and maintain high-quality management-employee interactions or organizational reputation. Such strategies may be less effective and economically impractical in the temporary nature of construction projects, suggesting a notable gap in management strategies that effectively foster workers' project identity to enhance safety behaviors. To fill this knowledge gap, the authors aim to develop and evaluate affordable and easy-to-implement managerial interventions that foster workers' project identification and safety behaviors. Drawing on social identity theory, the authors designed project identity-promoting messages and symbols that could be easily embedded into everyday items, such as posters and T-shirts. To evaluate their effectiveness, longitudinal field experiments were conducted, gathering 124 self-reported surveys on project identification and safety behavior from 31 workers before and after the interventions at two separate construction sites over three months. The survey data were analyzed using repeated measures (RM) ANOVA analysis to examine changes before and after the intervention. The results indicate significant improvements in both affective and behavioral dimensions of project identification, as well as in safety participation, demonstrating the potential of social identity-based interventions in improving workers' safety behaviors and project identification. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on construction organizations and construction safety by developing and evaluating practical managerial interventions based on social identity theory, which enhance construction workers' project identification and safety behavior.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: social identity theory, safety behaviour, management strategy, construction organization, dimension, construction worker, interaction, quality management, effectiveness, identity, strategy, construction site, drawing, survey, experiment, construction safety, body of knowledge, social identity, norms, construction project
Subjects: production management, quality assurance, behavioral psychology, practitioner, organization, knowledge management, management, performance management, social psychology, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, sociology, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, technical documentation, work location
Topics: Sustainability, Project Management, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Site Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here