Evaluation model for crack detection with deep learning: Improved confusion matrix based on linear features

Fan, C L (2025) Evaluation model for crack detection with deep learning: Improved confusion matrix based on linear features. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(3): 04024077, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Damage due to cracking can be detected through either manual visual methods or machine vision techniques for early prevention and maintenance. In recent years, image-based deep learning methods have emerged as potent tools for automatic crack detection. In this study, five deep learning object detection algorithms-faster R-CNN, single-shot detector (SSD), You Only Look Once (YOLO) v3 and v8, and RetinaNet-were systematically compared, and the results were analyzed. Object detection involves the generation of bounding boxes of various sizes for objects of interest. Because cracks are thin and small and thus difficult to capture in a unique bounding box, redundant measurements are common, but they compromise the accuracy and consistency of the model. Therefore, an improved confusion matrix based on linear features was employed in this study to evaluate the crack detection performance of the five object detection algorithms. In evaluation experiments, the overall accuracy levels of SSD were 90.6% on visible atmospherically resistant index (VARI) images, indicating effective concrete crack detection performance. Notably, SSD excels in cases involving small cracks and data imbalance, thus demonstrating a high level of model stability. This comparative analysis of the performances of different deep learning algorithms in crack detection contributes to the formulation of methods for automatic damage detection.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: concrete crack; damage detection; deep learning; image recognition
Index terms: object detection, machine vision, accuracy, experiment, comparative analysis, visual method, stability, prevention, deep learning
Subjects: computer vision, financial risk, structural engineering, research dissemination and communication, professional development, data analysis and analytics, artificial intelligence, data collection methods
Topics: Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here