Psychological bonding mechanisms and value creation in construction projects: Mediating role of participants' behaviors

Liu, X; Geng, L; Liu, D and Lin, S (2025) Psychological bonding mechanisms and value creation in construction projects: Mediating role of participants' behaviors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(3): 04024215, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

It has become gradually known that value creation in construction projects necessitates strong psychological bonds, empowering parties to collaborate more effectively toward achieving the project objectives. In this respect, this study presents an analysis exploring whether and how psychological bonding mechanisms, i.e., trust and shared vision, influence value creation in the construction project context. Through proposing a mediating framework, it is hypothesized that construction participants' high level of psychological bonding mechanisms would drive project value creation via encouraging their cooperative behaviors, both in-role and extra-role, while simultaneously impeding opportunistic behaviors. A total of 219 valid data sets, collected from professionals in the construction industry, were tested via covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) techniques, which corroborated the proposed framework. The findings suggest that trust and shared vision, as psychological bonding mechanisms, are vital conduits for nourishing participants' interactions, thereby playing a crucial role in facilitating value creation in projects. Moreover, shared vision was found to be more instrumental than trust in deterring opportunism. This study offers valuable theoretical and managerial insights into enhancing value creation by building trust and fostering shared vision. It highlights the importance of selecting reputable partners, implementing effective contractual settings, and establishing communication channels.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: covariance-based structural equation modeling; participants' behavior; psychological bonding mechanism; value creation
Index terms: structural equation modelling, opportunism, cooperative behaviour, value creation, construction project, interaction, construction industry, opportunistic behaviour
Subjects: economic development, production management, behavioral psychology, psychology, statistical analysis, industry analysis, business
Topics: Sustainability, Project Management, Organizational Design, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here