Multiobjective ant colony system algorithm for component-level construction schedule optimization

Shen, Z and Wu, J (2025) Multiobjective ant colony system algorithm for component-level construction schedule optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(3): 04025002, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Automatic generation of construction schedules has emerged as a key solution to address the inefficiencies and instabilities arising from the over-reliance on empirical judgment. However, traditional construction scheduling has been predominantly limited to regional levels, inadequately addressing the lean construction requirements of component-based prefabricated steel frame (PSF) structures. To bridge this gap, this study formulates an optimization model for the component-level resource-constrained project scheduling problem for PSF structures (C-RCPSP-PSF), which realizes the automatic extraction of precedence relationships from building information modeling three-dimensional (BIM 3D) models and the minimization of construction duration, costs, and carbon emissions. To address the C-RCPSP-PSF model, a novel multiobjective ant colony system (MOACS) algorithm is developed that utilizes three distinct colonies to individually tackle the objectives and combines taboo lists and global archives to enhance the search. Experimental results show the superior convergence and diversity of the MOACS over that of other competitive multiobjective optimization algorithms in solving the proposed model.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ant colony system algorithm; carbon emission; component-level; multiobjective optimization; resource-constrained project scheduling problem
Index terms: judgment, traditional construction, carbon emission, building information modelling, duration, scheduling, minimization, project scheduling, lean construction, steel frame, precedence relationship, optimization algorithm
Subjects: building construction, heritage and conservation, structural engineering, algorithms, operations research, climate science, project controls, information systems, dispute resolution
Topics: Site Management, Time Control, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here