Construction industrialization: A mosaic of definitions

Vásquez-Hernández, A; Alarcón, L F; Pellicer, E and Barkokebas, B (2025) Construction industrialization: A mosaic of definitions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(3): 03124010, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The underestimation of the conceptual divergences in the field of construction industrialization (CI) has led to the understanding of distinct positions and terms as equivalent and to their interchangeable use. This has generated ambiguity regarding the concept in literature and professional practice, limited knowledge exchange and collaboration, hindered the establishment of measurement bases and regulatory contexts, and led to incorrect assumptions about benefits. This study addresses the need for a comprehensive framework that highlights and facilitates the recognition and shared understanding of conceptual divergences in CI. An in-depth analysis of terminology and definitions was conducted through a systematic literature review, content analysis, and hierarchical cluster analysis. The findings present a comprehensive compendium of CI terms and definitions proposed between 1949 and 2023, cited at least once between 2017 and 2023. Sixty-eight underlying themes in CI definitions were identified, and the predominant conceptual approaches in contemporary literature were determined. Clarifying CI's conceptual divergences facilitates the effective exchange of knowledge and the consistent implementation of CI practices in diverse contexts. It also contributes to the work of researchers and professionals from diverse perspectives is based on the recognition and shared understanding of this diversity, promoting the advancement of the CI knowledge field.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; definitional analysis; industrialized construction; systematic literature review
Index terms: implementation, professional practice, collaboration, industrialized construction, cluster analysis, construction industry, knowledge exchange, systematic literature review, content analysis, industrialization
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, economic development, professional development, knowledge management, contractual arrangements, management, construction type, industry analysis, research evaluation and metrics
Topics: Procurement, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Information Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here