Zhan, Z; Dong, Y; Doe, D M; Hu, Y; Li, S; Cao, S; Li, W and Han, Z (2025) Deep learning and blockchain-driven contract theory: Alleviate gender bias in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(3): 04024216, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In the construction industry, the advent of teleoperation and robotic technologies is revolutionizing traditional recruitment practices, introducing new criteria for identifying qualified workers. This evolution presents significant challenges for employers aiming to recruit workers who can maximize organizational utility. Although contract theory offers a promising solution to these challenges, its inherent self-disclosure property could inadvertently lead to privacy breaches, such as revealing gender-related information. Such disclosure risk might intensify existing biases, notably gender bias, within the sector. To this end, we proposed deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based contract theory. Firstly, the trained DRL model will produce unpredictable contract bundles, restricting employers' access to workers' privacy. Subsequently, to ensure employers adopt DRL-based contract theory, we utilized blockchain to supervise contract bundle generation. Finally, given that the DRL models are homogenous among employers, we integrated transfer learning to reduce unnecessary overhead. Simulation experiments conducted using US labor force statistical data demonstrated that our work can effectively mitigate potential gender bias by augmenting the contract selection rights for female workers from 72.73% and 60% to 96.97% and 95% in comparison with traditional contract theory while maximizing employers' utility. In addition, with the integration of transfer learning, the training overhead of DRL-based contract theory can decrease by 50%. The meaning and significance of the results lie in the innovative integration of contract theory, deep reinforcement learning, and transfer learning into the recruitment framework, significantly advancing the body of knowledge in unbiased workforce development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | reinforcement, construction industry, recruitment, blockchain, contract theory, simulation experiment, deep learning, integration, bias, evolution, workforce development, privacy, body of knowledge, labour force, meaning |
| Subjects: | knowledge management, legal systems, environmental science, professional ethics, artificial intelligence, modelling and simulation, building materials, computing systems, industry analysis, sociology, organizational analysis, professional development, probability and distributions, economics, management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Sustainability, Education, Legal Issues, Supply Chain Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here