Chang, W C; Esmaeili, B and Hasanzadeh, S (2025) Impacts of physical and informational failures on worker-autonomy trust in future construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(4): 04025011, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Autonomous agents are increasingly becoming construction workers' teammates, making them an integral part of tomorrow's construction industry. Although many expect that worker-autonomy teaming will enhance construction efficiency, the presence of auto-agents, or robots necessitates an appropriate level of trust-building between workers and their autonomous counterparts, especially because these auto-agents' perfection still cannot be guaranteed. Although researchers have widely explored human-autonomy trust in various domains - such as manufacturing and the military - discussion of this teaming dynamic within the construction sector is still nascent. To address this gap, this paper simulated a futuristic bricklaying task to (1) examine whether identifying autonomous agents' physical and informational failures and risk perception affect workers' trust levels, and (2) investigate workers' neuropsychophysiological responses as a measure of trust levels toward robots, especially when autonomous agents are faulty. Results indicate that (1) identification of both types of failures and high-risk perception significantly reduce workers' trust in autonomous agents, and the nuances of workers' responses to both types of failures were discerned; and (2) brain activation correlates with trust changes. The findings suggest that workers' unfamiliarity with autonomous technologies, coupled with fast-growing interest in adopting them, may leave workers at risk of improper trust transfer or overtrust in the autonomous agents. This study contributes to an expanding exploration of worker-autonomy trust in construction and calls for further investigations into effective approaches for auto-agents to communicate their physical and informational failures and to help workers recover and repair trust.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | functional near-infrared spectroscopy; informational failures; physical failures; risk perception; trust transfer; trust violation; worker-autonomy trust |
| Index terms: | presence, investigation, construction industry, construction worker, becoming, efficiency, exploration, trust-building, violation, repair, agent, construction sector, risk perception |
| Subjects: | performance management, regulatory law, industry analysis, data collection methods, maintenance engineering, environmental hazards, philosophical process, practitioner, environmental science, environmental resource management, psychology |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here