Sun, R; Yan, Q; Zhang, C; Qiao, M and Ren, J (2025) Comprehensive evaluation of grouting effectiveness combining qualitative on-site tests and improved fuzzy integration with entropy weight method: Case study of a mountain tunnel. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(4): 04025020, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Grouting can considerably reduce water leakage and rock collapse disasters in mountain tunnels. Evaluating postgrouting effects is crucial for ensuring grouting quality. However, because grouting is a multifaceted problem, the quantitative evaluation of grouting effects remains challenging. Moreover, single-aspect evaluations often yield inaccurate results. To address these problems, this study comprehensively evaluated grouting effectiveness by combining qualitative and quantitative approaches based on three aspects, namely, grouting integrity, continuity, and sturdiness. An improved fuzzy integration using an entropy weight method (EWM) is proposed for quantifying tunnel grouting. As another key approach, numerous on-site tests were conducted to visually assess grouting effects. The conventional analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-fuzzy method was used to validate the EWM-fuzzy method. The results of the improved integration were consistent with those of the AHP-fuzzy method and the on-site tests, demonstrating the reliability of the proposed integration. Moreover, the AHP-fuzzy process was analyzed by assigning all applicable scale values in the nine-scale method, which is typically ignored. This analysis revealed that grouting integrity and continuity significantly influenced scores negatively, contrasting with the positive influence of sturdiness. Importantly, higher scale values did not uniformly improve results; outcomes depended on entries in judgment and membership matrices. The results of the study provide a reference for evaluating and managing tunnel grouting projects and related multifaceted problems. The proposed EWM-fuzzy integration provides a more efficient approach compared with the AHP-fuzzy process, highlighting the potential for using advanced methods. Finally, the enhanced AHP-fuzzy method resolves the shortcomings in single-value assignment within the nine-scale method.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytic hierarchy process; integration of entropy weight and fuzzy theory; multiple-criteria decision-making; tunnel grouting effectiveness |
| Index terms: | grouting, effectiveness, integrity, judgment, case study, fuzzy theory, fuzzy method, integration, decision-making, tunnel, entropy |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, performance management, thermal systems, infrastructure and transport systems, decision analysis, organizational analysis, construction methods, health safety and environment, decision-making and optimization |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Organizational Design, Risk Management, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here