Flow shop scheduling for prefabricated components production considering parallel machines and buffer constraints

Yu, M; Ruan, W; Zhou, Y and Zhao, Y (2025) Flow shop scheduling for prefabricated components production considering parallel machines and buffer constraints. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(4): 04025010, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This study introduces a novel scheduling approach to enhance the efficiency of prefabricated component production by integrating parallel equipment scheduling with intra- and inter-process constraints. It employs a homogeneous parallel equipment setup to maximize the productivity of individual production lines. The model further accounts for limited buffer spaces and prefabricated components' release times. Additionally, it incorporates factors such as the expiration of release agents and concrete setting times, which are crucial for the practical application of the scheduling strategy. A numerical analysis, informed by a case study from a prefabricated factory in Shenyang, China, demonstrates that this approach substantially reduces production time. Specifically, the proposed scheduling strategy results in a 26.47% reduction in total time compared to traditional manual scheduling, with the incorporation of multiple buffer constraints improving the accuracy of scheduling predictions. The model addresses the impact of multiple production constraints on productivity to formulate more precise scheduling plans for prefabricated component production across diverse production environments.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buffer constraints; hybrid flow shop; parallel-machine scheduling; prefabricated components production
Index terms: buffer, prefabricated component, efficiency, case study, productivity, China, agent, scheduling, strategy, numerical analysis, accuracy
Subjects: financial risk, Geography, operations research, practitioner, professional development, performance management, management, data analysis and analytics, design methods, data collection methods
Topics: Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Time Control, Geographical Context, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here