Hong, W T; Whyte, J and Xue, J (2025) A natural language processing-driven framework for policymaking in infrastructure development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(5): 04025025, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The trends and priorities in infrastructure policies and development affect how construction is planned and assessed, and ultimately shape the built environment. Comprehending these trends efficiently remains challenging due to the complex nature of analyzing extensive policy-related text data. This study leverages natural language processing (NLP) to develop a NLP-driven framework to identify prevalent infrastructure policies across time and propose corresponding strategies to inform policymaking. The framework provides a high flexibility of analysis, with extension to statistical analysis and strategic insights. The infrastructure policy strategic map is also proposed to further classify policies based on their trend and frequency of mentions. The novel framework proposed in this study offers a valuable approach to informing infrastructure policymaking by investigating unstructured textual data and offering strategic recommendations. The findings of the case study of New South Wales (NSW) infrastructure policymaking in Australia revealed the transition and prioritization of infrastructure policy focus over time, suggesting different strategic approaches to be implemented for each policy issue: reviewing historical policies, monitoring emerging policies, and assessing current ongoing policies. The NLP-driven framework and strategic map contribute to the body of knowledge by automating the analysis of unstructured policy-related textual data, offering a scalable and efficient method for policymakers to identify, classify, and prioritize infrastructure policies over time. This framework can also be applied to infrastructure policy development in other jurisdictions through the automatic analysis of a great quantity of policy data.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | infrastructure policy; natural language processing; policymaking; public agencies |
| Index terms: | jurisdiction, infrastructure development, strategy, agency, body of knowledge, New South Wales, statistical analysis, Australia, case study, built environment, monitoring |
| Subjects: | Geography, infrastructure engineering, legal systems, knowledge management, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, management, data science, control systems, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Site Management, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here