Sharing psychological safety climate at the group level among construction workers: The roles of group identification and interactional justice

Xia, N; Ding, S; Zhai, F and Xia, M (2025) Sharing psychological safety climate at the group level among construction workers: The roles of group identification and interactional justice. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(5): 04025038, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

As a powerful method for reducing accidents and harm in the construction domain, safety climate has garnered significant attention. However, previous research has focused primarily on top-down effects associated with the multilevel nature of safety climate, thereby overlooking how an upper-level safety climate can be generated. In this study, we shift the focus to how individual psychological safety climate can evolve into shared perceptions among group members (i.e., group safety climate) from a bottom-up perspective. Drawing upon social identity theory, we posit that group identification can transform psychological safety climate into group safety climate and that this process can be strengthened by interactional justice. Data were collected from 371 construction workers across 58 different groups. The hypotheses were tested using hierarchical linear modeling. The results demonstrated that psychological safety climate can be transformed into group safety climate by enhancing workers' group identification. This research also revealed that interactional justice weakened the degree to which workers' psychological safety climate contributes to group identification, thereby affecting the emergence of group safety climate. This study enriches our understanding of the relations among safety climates at multiple levels by revealing how and when psychological safety climate can be transformed into group safety climate. This study also provides deeper insights into the process of generating group safety climate by incorporating both its level and its strength. In addition to considering the property of level, the inclusion of the property of strength enriches the extant research on the construction industry. By explaining how a group-level safety climate is generated through an aggregation process involving psychological safety climate, we provide managers with the essential knowledge they need to take advantage of the individual psychological safety climate to establish, nurture, and sustain a positive safety climate within construction groups. Our study focuses on a sample of Chinese construction workers; hence, future research should utilize samples drawn from other geographical regions and cultural backgrounds to examine the robustness and generalizability of the findings of the present study.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction workers; group identification; interactional justice; multilevel model; safety climate; social identity theory
Index terms: drawing, safety climate, justice, manager, emergence, psychological safety, social identity theory, modelling, construction industry, construction worker
Subjects: technical documentation, social psychology, occupational health and safety management, systems engineering, industry analysis, practitioner, analytical methods, legal systems, health safety and environment
Topics: Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here