Chen, G; Yan, Z; Hao, Y; Li, Q and Tian, Y (2025) BIM value creation through collaboration in construction projects: An empirical model with multiple collaborative behaviors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(6): 04025048, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Building information modeling (BIM) use suffers from low performance in many construction projects. Although collaboration is critical for BIM value achievements, the underlying mechanism of BIM value creation through collaboration remains uncovered. Specifically, even if multiple collaborative behaviors were proposed for effective BIM use, few ever empirically investigated how these collaborative behaviors interact to affect BIM value. This study selected six critical collaborative behavior categories and constructed a BIM value creation model for empirical investigations. Survey data were collected from 162 Chinese construction projects, and partial least-squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was utilized to test the model. The results validated the positive impacts of adaptive behavior and server investment behavior on BIM value. Meanwhile, information-sharing behavior was proved to mediate the relationship between adaptive behavior and BIM value, as well as the relationship between server investment behavior and BIM value. In addition, harmonious behavior was found to positively moderate the relationship between adaptive behavior and joint working behavior. In contrast, flexible behavior negatively moderated the relationship between information-sharing behavior and BIM value. The results contribute to understanding how BIM value can be realized through multiple collaborative behaviors. The findings also provide managers with collaboration guidelines for BIM value achievements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | BIM value; building information modeling; collaboration; collaborative behaviors; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | adaptive behaviour, building information modelling, investigation, survey, structural equation modelling, manager, questionnaire, value creation, collaboration, construction project |
| Subjects: | practitioner, production management, economic development, data collection methods, human factors, information systems, statistical analysis, management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here