A construction site layout planning study for dust reduction

Yao, Z; Chen, Z and Lee, Y (2025) A construction site layout planning study for dust reduction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(6): 04025066, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Dust pollution generated by construction activities poses a serious threat to the health of workers. Studies have mainly focused on dust removal equipment, with relatively few studies on construction site layout planning (CSLP) for dust pollution reduction. This work designed a novel multiobjective CSLP model that integrates dust diffusion with the standard CSLP model (safety risk and transportation cost). After performance analysis between different solvers, our new model was solved by the popular Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III). Furthermore, weight sensitivity analysis was also conducted to determine the optimal weights of model objectives. Finally, the practicality was validated through several construction examples. The experimental results indicated (1) the optimal layout had average reductions of 9.1% in safety risk, 4.3% in transportation cost, and 40.4% in dust pollution compared to the original layout; and (2) NSGA-III demonstrated superior convergence and diversity compared to other competitive algorithms under both hypervolume and inverted generational distance metrics. This study enhances dust reduction approaches in the construction industry by integrating dust control into the preconstruction optimization of CSLP, enhancing the accuracy of dust pollution predictions and offering practical solutions for dust mitigation.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: mitigation, construction site, accuracy, dust control, genetic algorithm, sensitivity analysis, construction industry, performance analysis, construction activity, pollution
Subjects: construction operations, environmental hazards, algorithms, financial risk, work location, data analysis and analytics, environmental health, environmental engineering, industry analysis, professional development
Topics: Site Management, Digital Applications, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here