Zhan, H; Hwang, B G and Jabbar, S B B A (2025) An integrated approach to assessing digitalization of integrated digital delivery projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(6): 04025044, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
As digital technologies transform the built environment industry, the integrated digital delivery (IDD) initiative has emerged as a key approach to enhance project coordination, productivity, and sustainability. Despite the growing adoption of digital solutions, construction organizations lack effective tools to evaluate the digitalization level of IDD projects. While various frameworks exist for assessing organizational and industry-level digital maturity, there remains a significant gap in project-level assessment approaches, hindering organizations' ability to measure implementation progress and make informed technology decisions. This study aims to develop an IDD–digitalization assessment system (IDD-DAS) to measure the extent of digital implementation in IDD projects. A total of 31 digital activities, serving as key assessment indicators, were identified across four IDD project phases through literature review and expert validation. The fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE) method was employed to develop the IDD-DAS. The system was validated through three case studies across residential, commercial, and infrastructure projects, demonstrating its effectiveness and practical applicability. The findings revealed that the four project phases are equally important in determining the overall digital maturity, emphasizing the necessity for a holistic and integrated approach to digital innovation in the built environment industry. The identification of key digital activities within the four digital phases underscores the critical role of digital data management and collaboration platforms in IDD projects. This study advances the body of knowledge by developing a comprehensive project-level digitalization assessment system with systematically validated indicators that capture digital implementation across IDD project phases. The findings advance digital transformation practices in the global built environment industry, supporting organizations toward enhanced efficiency and innovation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | author keywords: integrated digital delivery; built environment industry; digital transformation; digitalization assessment; fuzzy synthetic evaluation |
| Index terms: | infrastructure project, implementation, coordination, effectiveness, built environment, data management, productivity, transformation, efficiency, construction organization, platform, case study, digital technology, body of knowledge, collaboration, validation, literature review, integrated approach, fuzzy synthetic evaluation, digitalization |
| Subjects: | knowledge management, contractual arrangements, digital technology, organization, decision-making and optimization, digital design, data analysis and analytics, computing systems, data collection methods, business, infrastructure and transport systems, data management, professional development, management, performance management |
| Topics: | Procurement, Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here