Hamida, M B; Remøy, H; Gruis, V and Jylhä, T (2025) Circular building adaptability in adaptive reuse: Multiple case studies in the Netherlands. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(1), pp. 161-183. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The application of circular building adaptability (CBA) in adaptive reuse becomes an effective action for resource efficiency, long-lasting usability of the built environment and the sped-up transition to a circular economy (CE). This paper aims to explore to which extent CBA-related strategies are applied in adaptive reuse projects, considering enablers and obstacles. Design/methodology/approach: A stepwise theory-practice-oriented approach was followed. Multiple-case studies of five circular adaptive reuse projects in The Netherlands were investigated, using archival research and in-depth interviews. A cross-case analysis of the findings was deductively conducted, to find and replicate common patterns. Findings: The study revealed that configuration flexibility, product dismantlability and material reversibility were applied across the case studies, whereas functional convertibility and building maintainability were less applied. Low cost of material reuse, collaboration among team members and organisational motivation were frequently observed enabling factors. Lack of information, technical complexities, lack of circularity expertise and infeasibility of innovative circular solutions were frequently observed obstacles to applying CBA. Practical implications: This paper provides practitioners with a set of CBA strategies that have been applied in the real world, facilitating the application of CBA in future adaptive reuse projects. Moreover, this set of strategies provides policymakers with tools for developing supportive regulations or amending existing regulations for facilitating CE through adaptive reuse. Originality/value: This study provides empirical evidence on the application of CBA in different real-life contexts. It provides scholars and practitioners with a starting point for further developing guiding or decision-making tools for CBA in adaptive reuse.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptability; adaptive reuse; circular building adaptability; circular economy; circularity |
| Index terms: | case study, archival research, low cost, adaptive reuse, circularity, circular economy, resource efficiency, built environment, interview, maintainability, usability, Netherlands, strategy, motivation, methodology, decision-making, collaboration, regulation, practitioner, adaptability, evidence, cross-case analysis, configuration, complexity, building adaptability |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, systems engineering, political science, infrastructure and transport systems, management, data analysis and analytics, research design and methodology, user-centered design, data collection methods, building performance, research methods, maintenance engineering, Geography, sustainable design, psychology, bidding, user focus, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, sustainable materials |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here