Capabilities required of the conventional project delivery (CPD) approach in producing quality design documentation: The Ghanaian construction industry perspective

Agbaxode, P D K; Saghatforoush, E and Dlamini, S (2025) Capabilities required of the conventional project delivery (CPD) approach in producing quality design documentation: The Ghanaian construction industry perspective. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(2), pp. 682-701. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: The conventional project delivery (CPD) approach has been reported in the literature as the most widely used project delivery method in the construction industry globally compared to other delivery methods. However, researchers and practitioners have argued that the approach, specifically during the production of design documentation under the CPD, lacks certain capabilities that ensure quality and enhance project delivery. Therefore, this study aims to use the Ghanaian construction industry to identify the capabilities required of the CPD in practice, particularly during the production of design documentation. Design/methodology/approach: The study design follows a pragmatist philosophy and uses mixed methods based on a deductive approach. Data collection involved a questionnaire survey, followed by semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data analysis used descriptive and inferential statistics, whereas qualitative data analysis used content analysis with the assistance of IBM SPSS and QSR Nvivo 12 Pro. Findings: Findings indicate that there should be incentives for producing good design documentation quality; mandatory coordination of design documentation; improving collaboration among designers; and allowing contractors to make input during the design stage. Practical implications: The results indicate the need for the identified capabilities to be introduced in the CPD approach to improve design documentation quality. Originality/value: This study offers a significant insight into the specific capabilities that are required of the CPD approach in practice particularly, in the production of design documentation

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: capabilities; conventional project delivery; design documentation; questionnaire survey
Index terms: mixed method, designer, delivery method, coordination, project delivery, statistics, construction industry, data analysis, interview, documentation, survey, philosophy, content analysis, questionnaire, design stage, practitioner, collaboration, methodology
Subjects: project delivery, data analysis and analytics, mathematical modelling, profession, data collection methods, industry analysis, philosophical studies, delivery method, professional development, management, professional practice, practitioner, research methods
Topics: Procurement, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here