Nguyen, M V (2025) Assessment of corporate social responsibility performance for Vietnamese construction organizations. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(2), pp. 477-500. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance is critical to address construction activities' environmental and social impacts. This study aims to evaluate the level of CSR implementation across various categories within the context of the Vietnamese construction industry. Design/methodology/approach: The literature review and semi-structured interviews were conducted to determine Vietnamese construction organizations' most commonly implemented CSR activities. A total of 252 valid responses were then obtained through a questionnaire survey. In addition, the fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE) method was used to evaluate the extent to which CSR categories have been implemented in construction companies. Findings: The findings revealed 31 commonly implemented CSR activities of the Vietnamese construction firms, which were grouped into four categories. Of the four categories, the FSE analysis showed that stakeholder CSR was the most critical category, followed by ethical CSR, philanthropic CSR and environmental CSR. Originality/value: This research provides valuable CSR activities to construction companies that intend to develop sustainably. Moreover, the proposed prioritization methodology offers practitioners a reliable and easy-to-use evaluation tool that clearly understands CSR performance within their organizations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction organizations; corporate social responsibility; evaluation; fuzzy synthetic evaluation; sustainable development; Vietnam; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | construction activity, construction organization, implementation, construction industry, evaluation tool, corporate social responsibility, social impact, sustainable development, literature review, survey, construction company, construction firm, Vietnam, interview, fuzzy synthetic evaluation, methodology, practitioner, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, sociology, industry analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, organization, practitioner, contractual arrangements, construction operations, research methods, health safety and environment, Geography, decision-making and optimization |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Procurement, Site Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here