Park, T; Mahamadu, A M; Agyekum, K; Adade-Boateng, A O; Manu, P; Adinyira, E and Adukpo, S (2025) An inquiry into the health and safety management practices of construction firms in South Korea. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(2), pp. 345-367. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to investigate the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) management practices of construction companies in South Korea to ascertain specific components and practices that need improvement for successful OSH performance. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative research strategy was adopted. A close-ended questionnaire survey covering 45 OSH management practices was sent to 324 contractors; 108 responses were gathered, representing a response rate of 33.3%. Data were analysed using simple descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) and Pearson's chi-square test. Findings: The findings revealed that there is a moderate level of implementation of OSH management practices among construction firms in South Korea. However, there is a significant disparity in terms of implementation between large enterprises on the one hand and small to medium enterprises on the other. Furthermore, a few of the business characteristics (i.e. the size of companies and certification to OHSAS 18001) were closely associated with the extent of the implementation of OSH management practices. Practical implications: This research uncovers the OSH management practices that are poorly implemented and lays the foundation for appropriate measures to improve OSH in South Korean construction companies. It suggests an effective strategy for communicating health and safety issues to workers, training safety managers, reviewing risk assessments, reviewing the health and safety plan, incentivising workers by rewarding good behaviour and having a penal mechanism for employees not adhering to the rules. Originality/value: The study provides insights into an under-investigated South Korean construction industry topic. It offers additional insight into state-of-the-art health and safety management practices in the construction industry in South Korea. Furthermore, it establishes which components of OSH management practice require improvement in the Korean context. This is also one of the few studies in OSH which establishes the association between the construction business characteristics and OSH management in the South Korean construction domain.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction firms; construction industry; occupational safety and health management; South Korea; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | management practice, methodology, questionnaire, state of the art, health and safety issues, strategy, construction firm, survey, construction company, manager, certification, health and safety, disparity, statistics, construction industry, implementation, health and safety management, risk assessment, occupational safety and health, South Korea, quantitative research |
| Subjects: | research methods, health safety and environment, Geography, financial risk, social justice, research dissemination and communication, organization, practitioner, contractual arrangements, management, occupational health and safety management, administrative processes, industry analysis, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Ethics, Procurement, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Contract Administration, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here