Combined wind catchers and side windows for cross ventilation in row houses

Tantasavasdi, C; Arttamart, S and Inprom, N (2025) Combined wind catchers and side windows for cross ventilation in row houses. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(3), pp. 1039-1056. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to explore the efficiency of natural ventilation in the bedrooms of typical two-storeyed row houses with newly reconfigured design that incorporate rooftop wind catchers and side windows to create cross ventilation. Design/methodology/approach: A CFD program was used to assess average air velocity coefficient (Cv) in 32 airflow cases. Parameters include location of openings with respect to wind direction, inlet-to-outlet area ratio (IOR) and opening-to-floor area ratio (OFR). Findings: The results reveal that indoor air velocities in the cases of air entering wind catchers are generally higher than those in the cases of air entering side windows while air velocities at the openings are the opposite. The IOR of 1:2 provides best results in terms of both velocities of the indoor air and velocities at the openings. Increasing the OFR from 20% to 50% generally improves indoor air velocities and airflow rates. Originality/value: This study proved that the new solution of combining one-sided wind catchers and side windows can effectively solve the problem of ventilation uniquely existing in the conditions of typical row houses by catching prevailing wind from two opposite directions into multiple rooms. The results are given as non-dimensional air velocities, which can be interpreted with any climatic data, and therefore can be applied to row houses in any locations and climatic conditions. The findings can create a new and efficient design of row houses that benefits building industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cross ventilation; location of openings; natural ventilation; opening size; row house; wind catcher
Index terms: building industry, efficiency, climatic condition, methodology, airflow rate, window, program, natural ventilation, bedroom, ventilation
Subjects: performance management, software systems, industry analysis, environmental engineering, air quality, architectural elements, research methods, climate science
Topics: Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here