Govender, N; Laryea, S and Watermeyer, R (2025) Implications of competitive tendering on consulting engineering services in South Africa: A thematic analysis. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 30(1), pp. 1-21. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose: Competitive tendering in South Africa is often associated with procurement based on the lowest fee tendered. Previous research on this topic did not provide in-depth examinations of how pricing within consulting engineering companies was affected by competitive tendering nor did it illuminate the extent to which professional services were impacted by competitive tendering. This paper aims to examine the implications of competitive tendering on pricing and delivery of consulting engineering services in South Africa. Design/methodology/approach: A survey research strategy with a questionnaire as the research instrument elicited qualitative data from 28 experienced consulting engineers in South Africa. Thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data from the questionnaires. Findings: Three key themes were identified, namely: considerations when determining consulting engineering fees on competitively tendered projects; the impact of reduced fees due to competitive tendering on the delivery of consulting engineering services; and interventions to prevent unsustainably "low" professional fees. Many consulting engineers in South Africa still determine fees using fee scales, while other considerations include resources, project complexity, risk, etc. Most participants asserted that design optimisation/value engineering, training, meetings and construction monitoring were adversely impacted by "low" fees. Originality/value: This paper provides in-depth qualitative feedback from experienced consulting engineers (most having more than 20 years' experience) on a topical issue in the South African construction industry. Thematic analysis was a novel method of analysis that was not used previously in this area of study.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competitive tendering; consulting engineering; fees; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | strategy, value engineering, consulting engineer, survey, competitive tendering, South Africa, design optimization, project complexity, methodology, professional service, questionnaire, thematic analysis, pricing, construction industry, monitoring |
| Subjects: | profession, data collection methods, control systems, value management, management, methods and analysis, industry analysis, organization, economic analysis, tendering, research methods, Geography, organizational theory, design process |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Project Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here