Gonsalves, N; Ogunseiju, O R and Akanmu, A A (2024) Activity recognition from trunk muscle activations for wearable and non-wearable robot conditions. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(6), pp. 1370-1385. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: Recognizing construction workers' activities is critical for on-site performance and safety management. Thus, this study presents the potential of automatically recognizing construction workers' actions from activations of the erector spinae muscles. Design/methodology/approach: A lab study was conducted wherein the participants (n = 10) performed rebar task, which involved placing and tying subtasks, with and without a wearable robot (exoskeleton). Trunk muscle activations for both conditions were trained with nine well-established supervised machine learning algorithms. Hold-out validation was carried out, and the performance of the models was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score. Findings: Results indicate that classification models performed well for both experimental conditions with support vector machine, achieving the highest accuracy of 83.8% for the "exoskeleton" condition and 74.1% for the "without exoskeleton" condition. Research limitations/implications: The study paves the way for the development of smart wearable robotic technology which can augment itself based on the tasks performed by the construction workers. Originality/value: This study contributes to the research on construction workers' action recognition using trunk muscle activity. Most of the human actions are largely performed with hands, and the advancements in ergonomic research have provided evidence for relationship between trunk muscles and the movements of hands. This relationship has not been explored for action recognition of construction workers, which is a gap in literature that this study attempts to address.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | activity recognition; EMG; machine learning; rebar task; wearable robot; work-related musculoskeletal disorders |
| Index terms: | activity recognition, construction worker, placing, rebar, accuracy, movement, machine learning, safety management, methodology, validation, evidence |
| Subjects: | health behaviours and lifestyles, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, research methods, artificial intelligence, building materials, modelling and simulation, professional development, concrete and cementitious materials, occupational health and safety management |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Materials, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here