Automated detection of learning stages and interaction difficulty from eye-tracking data within a mixed reality learning environment

Ogunseiju, O R; Gonsalves, N; Akanmu, A A; Abraham, Y and Nnaji, C (2024) Automated detection of learning stages and interaction difficulty from eye-tracking data within a mixed reality learning environment. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(6), pp. 1473-1489. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: Construction companies are increasingly adopting sensing technologies like laser scanners, making it necessary to upskill the future workforce in this area. However, limited jobsite access hinders experiential learning of laser scanning, necessitating the need for an alternative learning environment. Previously, the authors explored mixed reality (MR) as an alternative learning environment for laser scanning, but to promote seamless learning, such learning environments must be proactive and intelligent. Toward this, the potentials of classification models for detecting user difficulties and learning stages in the MR environment were investigated in this study. Design/methodology/approach: The study adopted machine learning classifiers on eye-tracking data and think-aloud data for detecting learning stages and interaction difficulties during the usability study of laser scanning in the MR environment. Findings: The classification models demonstrated high performance, with neural network classifier showing superior performance (accuracy of 99.9%) during the detection of learning stages and an ensemble showing the highest accuracy of 84.6% for detecting interaction difficulty during laser scanning. Research limitations/implications: The findings of this study revealed that eye movement data possess significant information about learning stages and interaction difficulties and provide evidence of the potentials of smart MR environments for improved learning experiences in construction education. The research implication further lies in the potential of an intelligent learning environment for providing personalized learning experiences that often culminate in improved learning outcomes. This study further highlights the potential of such an intelligent learning environment in promoting inclusive learning, whereby students with different cognitive capabilities can experience learning tailored to their specific needs irrespective of their individual differences. Originality/value: The classification models will help detect learners requiring additional support to acquire the necessary technical skills for deploying laser scanners in the construction industry and inform the specific training needs of users to enhance seamless interaction with the learning environment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: eye-tracking; interaction difficulty; learning stages; mixed reality; supervised learning; usability
Index terms: training need, learning outcome, learning experience, interaction, construction industry, technical skill, movement, experiential learning, construction company, accuracy, neural network, usability, laser scanning, evidence, construction education, methodology, machine learning
Subjects: learning methods, user-centered design, artificial intelligence, professional development, industry analysis, student development, health behaviours and lifestyles, evaluation and assessment methods, organization, analytical methods, research methods, educational resources, behavioral psychology, professional education
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Education, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here