Intelligent condition prediction model for bridge infrastructure based on evaluating machine learning algorithms

Abu Dabous, S; Alzghoul, A and Ibrahim, F (2025) Intelligent condition prediction model for bridge infrastructure based on evaluating machine learning algorithms. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 14(2), pp. 557-576. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: Prediction models are essential tools for transportation agencies to forecast the condition of bridge decks based on available data, and artificial intelligence is paramount for this purpose. This study aims at proposing a bridge deck condition prediction model by assessing various classification and regression algorithms. Design/methodology/approach: The 2019 National Bridge Inventory database is considered for model development. Eight different feature selection techniques, along with their mean and frequency, are used to identify the critical features influencing deck condition ratings. Thereafter, four regression and four classification algorithms are applied to predict condition ratings based on the selected features, and their performances are evaluated and compared with respect to the mean absolute error (MAE). Findings: Classification algorithms outperform regression algorithms in predicting deck condition ratings. Due to its minimal MAE (0.369), the random forest classifier with eleven features is recommended as the preferred condition prediction model. The identified dominant features are superstructure condition, age, structural evaluation, substructure condition, inventory rating, maximum span length, deck area, average daily traffic, operating rating, deck width, and the number of spans. Practical implications: The proposed bridge deck condition prediction model offers a valuable tool for transportation agencies to plan maintenance and resource allocation efficiently, ultimately improving bridge safety and serviceability. Originality/value: This study provides a detailed framework for applying machine learning in bridge condition prediction that applies to any bridge inventory database. Moreover, it uses a comprehensive dataset encompassing an entire region, broadening the model's applicability and representation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: artificial intelligence; bridge management system; bridges; condition monitoring; feature selection; machine learning; prediction model
Index terms: dataset, machine learning, model development, methodology, prediction model, management system, forest, artificial intelligence, monitoring, database, transportation agency, inventory, resource allocation
Subjects: artificial intelligence, prediction and forecasting, resource management, control systems, data management, management, environmental science, analytical methods, transportation engineering, research methods, inventory management
Topics: Research Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Supply Chain Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here