Scott, L and Fortune, C (2011) Formative assessment practices in built environment higher education programmes and the enhancement of the student learning experience. In: Egbu, C and Lou, E C W (eds.) Proceedings of 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2011, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
It is widely accepted across Higher Education (HE) that assessment has a strong link with learning and a key factor in this link is formative assessment. Formative assessment is generally defined as an activity taking place during a programme or unit of learning with the express purpose of improving and enhancing student learning. However, there is still considerable disagreement over the roles of lecturers and students in this process. It is therefore very important to understand how lecturers in built environment (BE) undergraduate education perceive their own roles and the role of their students in using assessment strategy to deliver deep learning. An investigation into lecturers' perceptions of their roles and their conceptions related to the assessment process of students in BE programmes is reported. An on-line survey was conducted with over 130 Irish BE academics involved with the delivery of undergraduate programmes in the areas of Architecture, Architectural Technology, Quantity Surveying and Construction Management. Additional data were also obtained and analysed from their associated programme documentation. Discussion is focused on a critical evaluation of the findings of the study with the current literature on the roles of BE academics in the formative assessment process. As a result recommendations are made on how lecturers may better formulate appropriate assessments for their students that will encourage deep learning and thus create enhanced HE learning experiences.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | academic practice; built environment; formative assessment; undergraduate |
| Index terms: | deep learning, survey, documentation, programme, higher education, strategy, surveying, architectural technology, learning experience, built environment, investigation, undergraduate, formative assessment |
| Subjects: | curriculum development, artificial intelligence, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data collection methods, learning methods, project controls, educational institutions, assessment methods, infrastructure and transport systems, management, design practice, professional development |
| Topics: | Information Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Time Control, Education, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here