Karunarathna, D C; Perera, H A H P; Perera, B A K S and Disaratna, P A P V D S (2025) Influence of delay in utility shifting for extension of time claims in road construction projects in Sri Lanka. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 14(2), pp. 489-510. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: Delays in utility shifting during road construction have broad ramifications. These delays not only lengthen the project's timeline but also raise expenses and cause problems with resource allocation. Thus, this study investigates the influence of delay in utility shifting for extension of time claims in road construction projects (RCPs) in Sri Lanka. Design/methodology/approach: The study used a quantitative approach with three rounds of Delphi surveys to gather empirical data. Further, the probability impact assessment was used to carefully analyse the data and appraise the information gathered. Findings: The findings initially revealed 33 causes of delays in utility shifting for extension of time claims in RCPs in Sri Lanka. Ultimately, 11 severe causes were identified based on their high probability and impact, concluding with 45 strategies that were assigned to overcoming those most severe causes of delay. Originality/value: This study will contribute to the industry and theory by providing solutions to handle utility-shifting delays with the linkage of preventing time extension claims for RCPs in Sri Lanka. Further, there is a dearth of literature in the research area, both locally and globally. Thus, the findings of this research will provide a benchmark for further detailed studies in other countries as well.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | delay in utility shifting; extension of time claims; road construction projects |
| Index terms: | causes of delay, Sri Lanka, road construction, linkage, Delphi survey, resource allocation, impact assessment, methodology, strategy |
| Subjects: | research methods, Geography, project controls, civil engineering, management, resource management, business, data collection methods, value management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Site Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here