A systemic approach to sustainable railway infrastructure planning: The case study of milton keynes

Okonta, U; Hosseinian-Far, A and Sarwar, D (2025) A systemic approach to sustainable railway infrastructure planning: The case study of milton keynes. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 14(2), pp. 407-428. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: With the rise in demand and adoption of smart city initiatives, it is imperative to plan the railway infrastructure, as it will have a huge positive impact if adequately integrated into the planning process. Given the complexities involved, a whole systems thinking framework provides a useful platform for rail transport planners. Design/methodology/approach: This paper proposes a simple, adoptable framework utilising systems thinking concepts and techniques taking into cognisance the key stakeholders. Milton Keynes in the United Kingdom is the adopted case study. Findings: Selected systems thinking tools and techniques are adopted to develop a framework for mapping stakeholders and attributes when developing sustainable rail transport systems, taking note of their core functionalities and the complex systems wherein they exist. Practical implications: The desire to build future (smart) cities is to effectively match infrastructural resources with a rapidly growing population, and the railway sector can play a strategic role in building a much more competitive low-carbon-emission transport system, which is a driving force for sustainable development. Social implications: The urban rail service has become vital to urban development as railway stations serve as hubs for sustainable mobility to meet local requirements. Moreover, it takes extra effort to input railway development into smart city plans, as it is a herculean task to get governments to focus on it with clarity of purpose in passing legislation. Originality/value: The developed framework reduces complexities when planning and designing rail transport systems compared to many of the existing reductionist planning approaches. The simplicity of the framework would also make it easily adoptable by a wide range of users.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: catwoe; ideal final result; railway infrastructure; smart cities; sustainable development; systemigram; systems thinking
Index terms: planning process, platform, mobility, case study, smart city, complex system, infrastructure planning, planner, urban development, legislation, railway station, systems thinking, functionality, United Kingdom, sustainable development, population, mapping, methodology, complexity
Subjects: urban sustainability, data collection methods, profession, infrastructure and transport systems, systems engineering, project controls, legal systems, analytical methods, strategic project management, design features, health safety and environment, Geography, urban design, digital design, research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, demography
Topics: Time Control, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Health and Safety, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here