A methodology to estimate the benefits and costs of stakeholder engagement in a transport decision-making process

Pagliara, F; El-Ansari, W and Henke, I (2025) A methodology to estimate the benefits and costs of stakeholder engagement in a transport decision-making process. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 14(2), pp. 326-341. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this paper is to propose a methodology to estimate the benefits and costs of stakeholder engagement (SE). Indeed, in the transport sector, it is consolidated that a good decision-making process foresees the involvement of the main stakeholders, but what are the benefits and costs of the SE? How to quantify these impacts and explicitly take them into account in a cost-benefit analysis? In this paper, an attempt to answer these questions is provided. Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, a methodology is proposed to estimate the benefits and costs of SE. Moreover, the proposed methodology is applied to a case study with an attempt to identify direct and indirect cost and benefit drivers within the context. Findings: A range of examples of the monetary costs and benefits of SE is provided through the case study of the high-speed rail corridor connecting Bari and Naples in Italy. Research limitations/implications: Limits in quantifying all the aspects of engagement. Practical implications: To be adopted by public administrations when deciding whether carrying out a project. Social implications: Social inclusion is a must in any decision-making process concerning big projects affecting the community. Originality/value: The original value of this paper is to provide a contribution to the current literature on the quantitative representation of the impacts of SE. Indeed, a methodology to quantify and monetize the costs and benefits of SE is proposed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: costs and benefits of se; equity; high-speed rail; mega projects; stakeholders' engagement; transportation decision-making process
Index terms: Italy, methodology, indirect cost, case study, decision-making process, stakeholder engagement, estimate, social inclusion
Subjects: data collection methods, community and social dimensions, financial and cost management, decision analysis, sociology, cost management, research methods, Geography
Topics: Ethics, Geographical Context, Procurement, Risk Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here