Alhusban, M; Elghaish, F; Hosseini, M R and Mayouf, M (2025) Revamping established project procurement approaches to support BIM implementation. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 14(3), pp. 672-695. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: Previous studies have established to a great extent that regulatory frameworks and, in particular, procurement approaches – that are common in a particular context – have a major impact on the success of building information modelling (BIM) implementation in construction projects. Despite the close links between these two concepts, research on the effect of procurement approaches on BIM implementation is scarce. To address this gap, this paper aims to investigate the barriers that affect BIM implementation through the lens of procurement approaches. Design/methodology/approach: A mixed-method approach was adopted using a questionnaire survey (n = 116) and interviews with key stakeholders (n = 12) in Jordan. The outcomes of the quantitative parts were augmented with findings from interviews. Findings: It was revealed that the deployment of unfavourable construction procurement approaches represents a major hurdle towards BIM implementation. Though essential for enhancing BIM implementation, it is revealed that a fundamental change from the common design-bid-build (DBB) to more collaborative procurement approaches remains infeasible in view of the realities that govern the construction industry. Research limitations/implications: It was revealed the deployment of unfavourable construction procurement approaches represents a major hurdle towards BIM implementation. Though essential for enhancing BIM implementation, it is revealed that a fundamental change from the common DBB to more collaborative procurement approaches remains infeasible given the realities that govern the construction industry. Originality/value: As the first of its kind, a set of recommendations for establishing supportive, workable procurement that does not deviate significantly from common procedures and practices is presented. Rather than advocating a shift to procurement approaches that are aligned with BIM, the findings offer novel insight into the necessity of developing a framework within the boundaries of the current and widely adopted procurement approaches to address the identified construction procurement issues and facilitate BIM implementation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | BIM diffusion; change management; construction procurement; digitalisation; sustainability; transition; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | construction procurement, construction industry, implementation, Jordan, building information modelling, design-bid-build, methodology, construction project, questionnaire, boundaries, project procurement, interview, digitalization, change management, survey |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, information systems, management, data collection methods, Geography, production management, research methods, property law, contractual arrangements, digital technology |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Project Management, Procurement, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here