Yonat, N; Isaac, S and Shohet, I M (2025) Complex infrastructure systems analysis and management: The theory of faults. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 14(3), pp. 599-624. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to provide a theoretical and practical theory and application that provides understanding and means to manage complex infrastructures. Design/methodology/approach: In this research, complexity, nonlinear, noncontinuous effects and aleatoric and data unknowns are bypassed by directly addressing systems' responses. Graph theory, statistics and digital signal processing (DSP) tools are applied within a theoretical framework of the theory of faults (ToF). Motivational complex infrastructure systems (CISs) are difficult to model. Data are often missing or erroneous, changes are not well documented and processes are not well understood. On top of it, under complexity, stalwart analytical tools have limited predictive power. The aleatoric risk, such as rain and risk cascading from interconnected infrastructures, is unpredictable. Mitigation, response and recovery efforts are adversely affected. Findings: The theory and application are presented and demonstrated by a step-by-step development of an application to a municipal drainage system. A database of faults is analyzed to produce system statistics, spatio-temporal morphology, behavior and traits. The gained understanding is compared to the physical system's design and to its modus operandi. Implications for design and maintenance are inferred; DSP tools to manage the system in real time are developed. Research limitations/implications: Sociological systems are interest driven. Some events are intentionally created and directed to the benefit and detriment of the opposing parties in a project. Those events may be explained and possibly predicted by understanding power plays, not power functions. For those events, sociological game theories provide better explanatory value than mathematical gain theories. Practical implications: The theory provides a thematic network for modeling and resolving aleatoric uncertainty in engineering and sociological systems. The framework may be elaborated to fields such as energy, healthcare and critical infrastructure. Social implications: ToF provides a framework for the modeling and prediction of faults generated by inherent aleatoric uncertainties in social and technological systems. Therefore, the framework and theory lay the basis for automated monitoring and control of aleatoric uncertainties such as mechanical failures and human errors and the development of mitigation systems. Originality/value: The contribution of this research is in the provision of an explicatory theory and a management paradigm for complex systems. This theory is applicable to a wide variety of fields from facilities and construction project management to maintenance and from academic studies to commercial use.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | climate change; complex infrastructure management; risk; stormwater drainage systems; the theory of faults [tof] |
| Index terms: | unknowns, construction project management, rain, paradigm, real time, monitoring, modelling, graph theory, critical infrastructure, statistics, infrastructure management, recovery, database, complex system, stormwater, mitigation, methodology, complexity, climate change, drainage, systems analysis, game theory |
| Subjects: | operations management, analytical methods, climate science, theoretical framing, research methods, financial risk, infrastructure engineering, decision models, mathematical modelling, control systems, data management, project controls, infrastructure and transport systems, systems engineering, environmental engineering, education and knowledge transfer, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Time Control, Site Management, Digital Applications, Cost Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here