Tembo, M; Kahanji, C and Mwanaumo, E M (2025) Socio-Political and Macro-Economic Impact of Tender Price Inflation in Zambian Public Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 7(2), pp. 67-97.
Abstract
A well-managed tender price allows governments to improve sustainable construction. Currently, there is no tender price management model to regulate tender price inflation in public projects in Zambia. The paper aims to develop a model that proposes a practical solution to critical challenges related to tender price inflation in public projects in Zambia. The study utilized mixed methods, in which purposive snowball sampling was used to identify 14 participants for interviews to investigate socio-political factors, and a questionnaire survey was administered to 170 project management practitioners to investigate economic factors that influence tender price inflation in the Zambian construction industry. Equations were derived from ordinary least squares (OLS) method to determine an optimum domain-specific tender price, while the qualitative data provide the basis for socio-political strategies. Findings show that the model has unlimited prediction capabilities while accounting for various correlations between volatilities. Further, combining the quantitative and qualitative platforms of the model facilitates a low variable tender-price output that is critical to the predictability and certainty in determining the ability of the project to meet interest and fund redemption. Key practical benefits of providing a construction model with low inflation in tender price include improved cost predictability. The study concludes that a model that reduces inflation in tender prices enables more accurate budgeting, helping stakeholders plan projects with a higher degree of certainty. This reduces the risk of cost overruns and allows for better resource allocation. The value of this study lies in its originality, as it presents the first comprehensive tender price management model specifically tailored to public construction projects in Zambia, offering an innovative solution to the persistent challenge of tender price inflation, and contributing significantly to the improvement of sustainable infrastructure development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | infrastructure development; management model; public sector; tender price |
| Index terms: | public construction, political factor, sampling, economic factor, construction industry, project management, resource allocation, mixed method, platform, cost overrun, Zambia, public sector, inflation, public project, economic impact, practitioner, questionnaire, accounting, interview, sustainable construction, strategy, tender price, survey, infrastructure development, budgeting |
| Subjects: | financial analysis, building construction, sustainable construction, digital design, infrastructure engineering, economic concepts, Geography, tendering, economic analysis, practitioner, political science, administrative law, industry analysis, project management theory and practice, financial management, management, financial and cost management, resource management, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Governance, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Sustainability, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here