Barbosa, S; Alberto, K C and Piroozfar, P (2025) Natural daylighting through double skin façades: A review. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 21(2), pp. 231-251. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
In buildings with double skin façades (DSF), the amount of light entering the internal spaces depends on the properties of the outer surface, the build-up of the layers of the façade, as well as their architectural features and shading devices (if any). However, studies focusing on the incidence of daylighting in buildings with DSF are still few and far between. In this context, this study aims at reviewing the previous academic research on the effects of DSF on daylighting in buildings, analysing the impacts of architectural design and detailing parameters (e.g. shading device, cavity depth, structure, skin fabric materials, and build-up, and the building and façade orientations) on the natural lighting of buildings with DSF. This study uses a scoping methodology to filter through the state-of-the-art in the literature on DSF. In this study, the literature search has been conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect leading into 148 major publications. The final number was narrowed down to 33 due to several reasons. Overall, results indicate that, compared to conventional façades, DSF decreases daylight levels, prevents glare, and enhances a more uniform distribution of light in internal spaces of buildings. Concluding remarks identify the gaps in the knowledge and pinpoint potential areas for future research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | daylighting; double façade; double skin façade; natural lighting; ventilated façade |
| Index terms: | daylighting, science, internal space, state of the art, methodology, architectural design, publication, shading, glare |
| Subjects: | building performance, specialized design, research methods, research dissemination and communication, specialized education, building design, design practice |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Information Management, Research Practice, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here