Gaspari, J; Fabbri, K and Marchi, L (2025) Investigating the influence of perforated façade skins on indoor illuminance level: A case study. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 21(2), pp. 211-230. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Building shading systems is crucial to both avoid indoor overheating during summer and control daylight inflow. This is particularly relevant in exposed glazed façade during summer, where the risk of excessive solar radiation and light entering the building is elevated. The study proposes the use of Dialux software to support the design of sun-shading devices with the two-fold objective of reducing the risk of glare along the façade side and avoiding a dark effect on the opposite side. The procedure is based on a multiple-design approach that simulates the effect of diverse shading panel configurations on indoor illuminance distribution. Then the procedure is implemented on a residential case study in Bologna (Italy) resulted in having a limited depth and thus a high risk of excessive illuminance. The results demonstrate that Dialux is sensitive to changes in the openness factor and geometry of the panel. The multiple simulations allowed the optimal illuminance level of around 300 lux for more than 70% of the case study room surface while containing the area exceeding the optimal level under 1000 lux to less than 20% and to avoid reaching the minimum threshold of 100 lux through a shading system with Openness Factor ranging between 11 and 15%. The workflow can serve not only as a tool for addressing and verifying the design choices but as a design support means itself. Due to its structure and easiness of inputting data and modelling stage, the methodology has a high replicability potential.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building performance; daylight; dialux; illuminance level; perforated solar screen; shading devices |
| Index terms: | summer, glare, modelling, illuminance, sun, geometry, case study, solar radiation, methodology, Italy, configuration, workflow, shading, overheating, building performance |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, climate science, quality assurance, building performance, Geography, research methods, energy systems, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, thermal systems, systems engineering, management, building design |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Design Practice, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here